Difference between revisions of "Bibliography"

From RSNA Radiology Reporting Initiative
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
[http://www.jacr.org/article/S1546-1440(04)00270-4/abstract A framework for improving radiology reporting]
 
[http://www.jacr.org/article/S1546-1440(04)00270-4/abstract A framework for improving radiology reporting]
  
A [http://www.structuredreporting.com/langlotz-article.htm#bibliography bibliography] from structuredreporting.com
+
 
 +
<h3>Report Signature Turn-Around</h3>
 +
<ol>
 +
  <li>Bluth E, Havrilla M, Blakeman C. Quality improvement techniques: Value to
 +
    improve the timeliness of preoperative chest radiographic reports, AJR
 +
    1993;160:995-998.</li>
 +
  <li>Seltzer S. Kelly P. Adams D. Chiango B, Viero M, Fener E, Rondeau R,
 +
    Kazanjian N, Laffel G, Shaffer K, Williamson D, Aliabadi P, Gillis A, Holman
 +
    L, Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports: Use of total quality
 +
    management to facilitate radiologists' report signing, AJR 1994;162:775-781.</li>
 +
</ol>
 +
<h3>Reporting Clarity</h3>
 +
<ol>
 +
  <li>Kong A, Barnett G, Mosteller F, Youtz C. How medical professionals
 +
    evaluate expressions of probability. New Engl J Med 1986;315:740-744.</li>
 +
  <li>American College of Radiology. ACR Standard for Communication; Diagnostic
 +
    Radiology. Reston, VA: ACR, 1995. Impact of Reporting Errors</li>
 +
  <li>Holman B, Aliabadi P, Silverman S, Weissman 13, Rudolph L, Fener U.
 +
    Medical impact of unedited preliminary radiology reports. Radiology
 +
    1994;191:519-521.</li>
 +
  <li>Clinger N, Hunter T, Hillman B. Radiology reporting: Attitudes of refering
 +
    phyisicans. Radiology 1988;169:825-826.</li>
 +
  <li>Sobel J, Pearson M, Gross K, Desmond K, Harrison E, Rubenstein L, Rogers
 +
    W, Kahn K. Information content and clarity Of radiologists' reports for
 +
    chest radiography. Acad Radiol 1990;3:709-717.</li>
 +
</ol>
 +
<h3>Evaluations of Report Quality</h3>
 +
<ol>
 +
  <li>Kalbhen C, Yetter E, Olson M, Posniak H, Aranha G. Assessing the
 +
    resectability of pancreatic carcinoma: The value of reinterpreting abdominal
 +
    CT performed at other institutions. AJR 1998;171:1571-1576.</li>
 +
  <li>Magen A, Langlotz C, Banner M, Orel S, Sullivan D, Birnbaum B, Ramchandani
 +
    P, Jacobs J. Interpretation of outside examinations: An undervalued service?
 +
    American Roentgen Ray Society. Boston, MA: ARRS, 1997.</li>
 +
  <li>Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH, Howard DH, Feinstein AR. Variability in
 +
    radiologists' interpretations; of mammograms. New EngI J Med
 +
    1994;33:1493-1499.</li>
 +
</ol>
 +
<h3>Foundational Structured Reporting Research</h3>
 +
<ol>
 +
  <li>Gagliardi R. The evolution of the X-ray report. AJR 1995;164;501-502.</li>
 +
  <li>Clayton P, Ostler D, Gennaro J, Beatty S, Frederick P. A radiology
 +
    reporting system based oil most likely diagnoses. Comp Biomed Res
 +
    1980;13:258-270.</li>
 +
  <li>Greenes R, OBUS: A microcomputer system for measurement, Calculation,
 +
    reporting, and retrieval of obstetric ultrasound examinations. Radiology
 +
    1992;144:979-833.</li>
 +
  <li>Greene R, Barnett G, Klein S, Robbins A, Prior R. Recording, retrieval,
 +
    and review of medical data by physician computer interaction. New Engl J Med
 +
    1970;282:307-315.</li>
 +
  <li>Pendergrass H, Greenes R, Barnett G, Poitras 1, Pappalardo A, Marble C.
 +
    Ali on-line computer facility for systematized input of radiology reports.
 +
    Radiology 1969;92:709-713.</li>
 +
</ol>
 +
<h3>Current Structured Reporting Systems</h3>
 +
<ol>
 +
  <li>Bell D, Greenes R, Doubilet P. Form-based clinical input from a structured
 +
    vocabulary: Initial application in ultrasound reporting. JAMIA
 +
    1992;Symposium Supplement:789-91.</li>
 +
  <li>Kahn C, Wang K, Bell D, Structured entry of radiology reports using
 +
    world-wide web technology. Radiographics 1996;16:683-691.</li>
 +
  <li>Bell D, Pattison-Gordon E, Greenes R. Experiments in concept modeling for
 +
    radiographic image reports. JAMIA 1994;1:249-262.</li>
 +
</ol>
 +
<h3>Evaluation of Structured Reporting Systems</h3>
 +
<ol>
 +
  <li>Bell D, Greenes R, Evaluation of UltraSTAR; Performance of a collaborative
 +
    structured data entry system, JAMIA 1994;Symposium Supplement:216-222.</li>
 +
  <li>Moorman P, van Ginneken A, Siersema P, van der Lei J, van Bemmel J.
 +
    Evaluation of reporting based on descriptional knowledge, JAMIA
 +
    1995;2:365-373.</li>
 +
  <li>Gouveia-Oliveira A, Raposo V, Salgado N, Almeida I, Nobre-Leitao C, de
 +
    Melo F. Longitudinal comparative study: The influence of computers on
 +
    reporting of clinical data. Endoscopy 1991;23:334-7.</li>
 +
  <li>Melson D, Brophy R, Blaine J, Jost R, Brink G. Impact of a voice
 +
    recognition system on report cycle time and radiologist reading time. In
 +
    Horii S, Blaine J, cds. Proceedings of Medical Imaging 1998: PACS Design and
 +
    Evaluation, Bellingham, WA: SPIE, 1998:226-236.</li>
 +
</ol>
 +
<h3>Imaging Lexicons</h3>
 +
<ol>
 +
  <li>National Cancer Institute. Dictionary of Common Data Elements http://cii.nci.nih.gov/cde.</li>
 +
  <li>D'Orsi C, Kopans D, American College of Radiology's mammography lexicon:
 +
    Barking up the only tree. AJR 1994; 162:595.</li>
 +
  <li>American College of Radiology. Glossary of MR Terms. Reston, VA: ACR,
 +
    1995.</li>
 +
  <li>Tuddenham W, Glossary of terms for thoracic radiology; Recommendations of
 +
    the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. AJR 1984;143:509-517.</li>
 +
</ol>
 +
<h3>Imaging Decision Support</h3>
 +
<ol>
 +
  <li>Nishikawa RM, Doi K, Giger ML, Schmidt RA, Vyborny CJ, Monnier-Cholley L,
 +
    Papaioannou J, Lu P. Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications:
 +
    Evaluation of performance on mammograms from multiple centers. Radiographics
 +
    1995; 15:443-452.</li>
 +
  <li>Swets JA, Getty DJ, Pickett RM, D'Orsi CJ, Seltzer SE, McNeil BJ,
 +
    Enhancing and evaluating diagnostic accuracy. Med Decis Making 1991;11:9-18.</li>
 +
  <li>Poon A, Fagan L, Shortliffe E. The Pen-Ivory project; Exploring
 +
    user-interface design for the selection of items from large controlled
 +
    vocabularies of medicine. JAMIA 1996;3:168-183.</li>
 +
  <li>Musen M, Weickert K, Miller F, Campbell K, Fagan L, Development of a
 +
    controlled medical terminology: Knowledge acquisition and knowledge
 +
    representation. Meth Info Mod 1995;34:85-95.</li>
 +
</ol>
 +
<p>&nbsp;</p>
 +
<p><font color="#000000">&nbsp;</font></p>
 +
<p>&nbsp;</p>
 +
 
 +
</body>
 +
 
 +
</html>

Revision as of 22:30, 28 May 2009

Examining Radiologist and Clinician Preferences Regarding Style and Content

A framework for improving radiology reporting


Report Signature Turn-Around

  1. Bluth E, Havrilla M, Blakeman C. Quality improvement techniques: Value to improve the timeliness of preoperative chest radiographic reports, AJR 1993;160:995-998.
  2. Seltzer S. Kelly P. Adams D. Chiango B, Viero M, Fener E, Rondeau R, Kazanjian N, Laffel G, Shaffer K, Williamson D, Aliabadi P, Gillis A, Holman L, Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports: Use of total quality management to facilitate radiologists' report signing, AJR 1994;162:775-781.

Reporting Clarity

  1. Kong A, Barnett G, Mosteller F, Youtz C. How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability. New Engl J Med 1986;315:740-744.
  2. American College of Radiology. ACR Standard for Communication; Diagnostic Radiology. Reston, VA: ACR, 1995. Impact of Reporting Errors
  3. Holman B, Aliabadi P, Silverman S, Weissman 13, Rudolph L, Fener U. Medical impact of unedited preliminary radiology reports. Radiology 1994;191:519-521.
  4. Clinger N, Hunter T, Hillman B. Radiology reporting: Attitudes of refering phyisicans. Radiology 1988;169:825-826.
  5. Sobel J, Pearson M, Gross K, Desmond K, Harrison E, Rubenstein L, Rogers W, Kahn K. Information content and clarity Of radiologists' reports for chest radiography. Acad Radiol 1990;3:709-717.

Evaluations of Report Quality

  1. Kalbhen C, Yetter E, Olson M, Posniak H, Aranha G. Assessing the resectability of pancreatic carcinoma: The value of reinterpreting abdominal CT performed at other institutions. AJR 1998;171:1571-1576.
  2. Magen A, Langlotz C, Banner M, Orel S, Sullivan D, Birnbaum B, Ramchandani P, Jacobs J. Interpretation of outside examinations: An undervalued service? American Roentgen Ray Society. Boston, MA: ARRS, 1997.
  3. Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH, Howard DH, Feinstein AR. Variability in radiologists' interpretations; of mammograms. New EngI J Med 1994;33:1493-1499.

Foundational Structured Reporting Research

  1. Gagliardi R. The evolution of the X-ray report. AJR 1995;164;501-502.
  2. Clayton P, Ostler D, Gennaro J, Beatty S, Frederick P. A radiology reporting system based oil most likely diagnoses. Comp Biomed Res 1980;13:258-270.
  3. Greenes R, OBUS: A microcomputer system for measurement, Calculation, reporting, and retrieval of obstetric ultrasound examinations. Radiology 1992;144:979-833.
  4. Greene R, Barnett G, Klein S, Robbins A, Prior R. Recording, retrieval, and review of medical data by physician computer interaction. New Engl J Med 1970;282:307-315.
  5. Pendergrass H, Greenes R, Barnett G, Poitras 1, Pappalardo A, Marble C. Ali on-line computer facility for systematized input of radiology reports. Radiology 1969;92:709-713.

Current Structured Reporting Systems

  1. Bell D, Greenes R, Doubilet P. Form-based clinical input from a structured vocabulary: Initial application in ultrasound reporting. JAMIA 1992;Symposium Supplement:789-91.
  2. Kahn C, Wang K, Bell D, Structured entry of radiology reports using world-wide web technology. Radiographics 1996;16:683-691.
  3. Bell D, Pattison-Gordon E, Greenes R. Experiments in concept modeling for radiographic image reports. JAMIA 1994;1:249-262.

Evaluation of Structured Reporting Systems

  1. Bell D, Greenes R, Evaluation of UltraSTAR; Performance of a collaborative structured data entry system, JAMIA 1994;Symposium Supplement:216-222.
  2. Moorman P, van Ginneken A, Siersema P, van der Lei J, van Bemmel J. Evaluation of reporting based on descriptional knowledge, JAMIA 1995;2:365-373.
  3. Gouveia-Oliveira A, Raposo V, Salgado N, Almeida I, Nobre-Leitao C, de Melo F. Longitudinal comparative study: The influence of computers on reporting of clinical data. Endoscopy 1991;23:334-7.
  4. Melson D, Brophy R, Blaine J, Jost R, Brink G. Impact of a voice recognition system on report cycle time and radiologist reading time. In Horii S, Blaine J, cds. Proceedings of Medical Imaging 1998: PACS Design and Evaluation, Bellingham, WA: SPIE, 1998:226-236.

Imaging Lexicons

  1. National Cancer Institute. Dictionary of Common Data Elements http://cii.nci.nih.gov/cde.
  2. D'Orsi C, Kopans D, American College of Radiology's mammography lexicon: Barking up the only tree. AJR 1994; 162:595.
  3. American College of Radiology. Glossary of MR Terms. Reston, VA: ACR, 1995.
  4. Tuddenham W, Glossary of terms for thoracic radiology; Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. AJR 1984;143:509-517.

Imaging Decision Support

  1. Nishikawa RM, Doi K, Giger ML, Schmidt RA, Vyborny CJ, Monnier-Cholley L, Papaioannou J, Lu P. Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications: Evaluation of performance on mammograms from multiple centers. Radiographics 1995; 15:443-452.
  2. Swets JA, Getty DJ, Pickett RM, D'Orsi CJ, Seltzer SE, McNeil BJ, Enhancing and evaluating diagnostic accuracy. Med Decis Making 1991;11:9-18.
  3. Poon A, Fagan L, Shortliffe E. The Pen-Ivory project; Exploring user-interface design for the selection of items from large controlled vocabularies of medicine. JAMIA 1996;3:168-183.
  4. Musen M, Weickert K, Miller F, Campbell K, Fagan L, Development of a controlled medical terminology: Knowledge acquisition and knowledge representation. Meth Info Mod 1995;34:85-95.

 

 

 

</body>

</html>