Difference between revisions of "Bibliography"

From RSNA Radiology Reporting Initiative
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
[http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/176/3/591 Examining Radiologist and Clinician Preferences Regarding Style and Content]
+
<h3>Structured Reporting</h3>
−
 
+
<ol>
−
[http://www.jacr.org/article/S1546-1440(04)00270-4/abstract A framework for improving radiology reporting]
+
<li>[http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/176/3/591 Examining Radiologist and Clinician Preferences Regarding Style and Content].</li>
−
 
 
  
 +
<li>[http://www.jacr.org/article/S1546-1440(04)00270-4/abstract A framework for improving radiology reporting].</li>
 +
</ol>
 +
<h3>Imaging Lexicons</h3>
 +
<ol>
 +
  <li>[http://www.radlex.org RSNA RadLex]</li>
 +
  <li>D'Orsi C, Kopans D, American College of Radiology's mammography lexicon:
 +
    Barking up the only tree. AJR 1994; 162:595.</li>
 +
  <li>American College of Radiology. Glossary of MR Terms. Reston, VA: ACR,
 +
    1995.</li>
 +
  <li>Tuddenham W, Glossary of terms for thoracic radiology; Recommendations of
 +
    the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. AJR 1984;143:509-517.</li>
 +
</ol>
 
<h3>Report Signature Turn-Around</h3>
 
<h3>Report Signature Turn-Around</h3>
 
<ol>
 
<ol>
−
  <li>Bluth E, Havrilla M, Blakeman C. Quality improvement techniques: Value to
 
−
    improve the timeliness of preoperative chest radiographic reports, AJR
 
−
    1993;160:995-998.</li>
 
 
   <li>Seltzer S. Kelly P. Adams D. Chiango B, Viero M, Fener E, Rondeau R,
 
   <li>Seltzer S. Kelly P. Adams D. Chiango B, Viero M, Fener E, Rondeau R,
 
     Kazanjian N, Laffel G, Shaffer K, Williamson D, Aliabadi P, Gillis A, Holman
 
     Kazanjian N, Laffel G, Shaffer K, Williamson D, Aliabadi P, Gillis A, Holman
Line 34: Line 42:
 
     resectability of pancreatic carcinoma: The value of reinterpreting abdominal
 
     resectability of pancreatic carcinoma: The value of reinterpreting abdominal
 
     CT performed at other institutions. AJR 1998;171:1571-1576.</li>
 
     CT performed at other institutions. AJR 1998;171:1571-1576.</li>
−
  <li>Magen A, Langlotz C, Banner M, Orel S, Sullivan D, Birnbaum B, Ramchandani
 
−
    P, Jacobs J. Interpretation of outside examinations: An undervalued service?
 
−
    American Roentgen Ray Society. Boston, MA: ARRS, 1997.</li>
 
 
   <li>Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH, Howard DH, Feinstein AR. Variability in
 
   <li>Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH, Howard DH, Feinstein AR. Variability in
 
     radiologists' interpretations; of mammograms. New EngI J Med
 
     radiologists' interpretations; of mammograms. New EngI J Med
Line 45: Line 50:
 
   <li>Gagliardi R. The evolution of the X-ray report. AJR 1995;164;501-502.</li>
 
   <li>Gagliardi R. The evolution of the X-ray report. AJR 1995;164;501-502.</li>
 
   <li>Clayton P, Ostler D, Gennaro J, Beatty S, Frederick P. A radiology
 
   <li>Clayton P, Ostler D, Gennaro J, Beatty S, Frederick P. A radiology
−
     reporting system based oil most likely diagnoses. Comp Biomed Res
+
     reporting system based on most likely diagnoses. Comp Biomed Res
 
     1980;13:258-270.</li>
 
     1980;13:258-270.</li>
 
   <li>Greenes R, OBUS: A microcomputer system for measurement, Calculation,
 
   <li>Greenes R, OBUS: A microcomputer system for measurement, Calculation,
Line 57: Line 62:
 
     Radiology 1969;92:709-713.</li>
 
     Radiology 1969;92:709-713.</li>
 
</ol>
 
</ol>
−
<h3>Current Structured Reporting Systems</h3>
+
<h3>Early Structured Reporting Systems</h3>
 
<ol>
 
<ol>
 
   <li>Bell D, Greenes R, Doubilet P. Form-based clinical input from a structured
 
   <li>Bell D, Greenes R, Doubilet P. Form-based clinical input from a structured
Line 82: Line 87:
 
     Evaluation, Bellingham, WA: SPIE, 1998:226-236.</li>
 
     Evaluation, Bellingham, WA: SPIE, 1998:226-236.</li>
 
</ol>
 
</ol>
−
<h3>Imaging Lexicons</h3>
 
−
<ol>
 
−
  <li>National Cancer Institute. Dictionary of Common Data Elements http://cii.nci.nih.gov/cde.</li>
 
−
  <li>D'Orsi C, Kopans D, American College of Radiology's mammography lexicon:
 
−
    Barking up the only tree. AJR 1994; 162:595.</li>
 
−
  <li>American College of Radiology. Glossary of MR Terms. Reston, VA: ACR,
 
−
    1995.</li>
 
−
  <li>Tuddenham W, Glossary of terms for thoracic radiology; Recommendations of
 
−
    the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. AJR 1984;143:509-517.</li>
 
−
</ol>
 
−
<h3>Imaging Decision Support</h3>
 
−
<ol>
 
−
  <li>Nishikawa RM, Doi K, Giger ML, Schmidt RA, Vyborny CJ, Monnier-Cholley L,
 
−
    Papaioannou J, Lu P. Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications:
 
−
    Evaluation of performance on mammograms from multiple centers. Radiographics
 
−
    1995; 15:443-452.</li>
 
−
  <li>Swets JA, Getty DJ, Pickett RM, D'Orsi CJ, Seltzer SE, McNeil BJ,
 
−
    Enhancing and evaluating diagnostic accuracy. Med Decis Making 1991;11:9-18.</li>
 
−
  <li>Poon A, Fagan L, Shortliffe E. The Pen-Ivory project; Exploring
 
−
    user-interface design for the selection of items from large controlled
 
−
    vocabularies of medicine. JAMIA 1996;3:168-183.</li>
 
−
  <li>Musen M, Weickert K, Miller F, Campbell K, Fagan L, Development of a
 
−
    controlled medical terminology: Knowledge acquisition and knowledge
 
−
    representation. Meth Info Mod 1995;34:85-95.</li>
 
−
</ol>
 
−
<p>&nbsp;</p>
 
−
<p><font color="#000000">&nbsp;</font></p>
 
−
<p>&nbsp;</p>
 
−
 
−
</body>
 
−
 
−
</html>
 

Latest revision as of 13:26, 29 May 2009

Structured Reporting

  1. Examining Radiologist and Clinician Preferences Regarding Style and Content.
  2. A framework for improving radiology reporting.

Imaging Lexicons

  1. RSNA RadLex
  2. D'Orsi C, Kopans D, American College of Radiology's mammography lexicon: Barking up the only tree. AJR 1994; 162:595.
  3. American College of Radiology. Glossary of MR Terms. Reston, VA: ACR, 1995.
  4. Tuddenham W, Glossary of terms for thoracic radiology; Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. AJR 1984;143:509-517.

Report Signature Turn-Around

  1. Seltzer S. Kelly P. Adams D. Chiango B, Viero M, Fener E, Rondeau R, Kazanjian N, Laffel G, Shaffer K, Williamson D, Aliabadi P, Gillis A, Holman L, Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports: Use of total quality management to facilitate radiologists' report signing, AJR 1994;162:775-781.

Reporting Clarity

  1. Kong A, Barnett G, Mosteller F, Youtz C. How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability. New Engl J Med 1986;315:740-744.
  2. American College of Radiology. ACR Standard for Communication; Diagnostic Radiology. Reston, VA: ACR, 1995. Impact of Reporting Errors
  3. Holman B, Aliabadi P, Silverman S, Weissman 13, Rudolph L, Fener U. Medical impact of unedited preliminary radiology reports. Radiology 1994;191:519-521.
  4. Clinger N, Hunter T, Hillman B. Radiology reporting: Attitudes of refering phyisicans. Radiology 1988;169:825-826.
  5. Sobel J, Pearson M, Gross K, Desmond K, Harrison E, Rubenstein L, Rogers W, Kahn K. Information content and clarity Of radiologists' reports for chest radiography. Acad Radiol 1990;3:709-717.

Evaluations of Report Quality

  1. Kalbhen C, Yetter E, Olson M, Posniak H, Aranha G. Assessing the resectability of pancreatic carcinoma: The value of reinterpreting abdominal CT performed at other institutions. AJR 1998;171:1571-1576.
  2. Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH, Howard DH, Feinstein AR. Variability in radiologists' interpretations; of mammograms. New EngI J Med 1994;33:1493-1499.

Foundational Structured Reporting Research

  1. Gagliardi R. The evolution of the X-ray report. AJR 1995;164;501-502.
  2. Clayton P, Ostler D, Gennaro J, Beatty S, Frederick P. A radiology reporting system based on most likely diagnoses. Comp Biomed Res 1980;13:258-270.
  3. Greenes R, OBUS: A microcomputer system for measurement, Calculation, reporting, and retrieval of obstetric ultrasound examinations. Radiology 1992;144:979-833.
  4. Greene R, Barnett G, Klein S, Robbins A, Prior R. Recording, retrieval, and review of medical data by physician computer interaction. New Engl J Med 1970;282:307-315.
  5. Pendergrass H, Greenes R, Barnett G, Poitras 1, Pappalardo A, Marble C. Ali on-line computer facility for systematized input of radiology reports. Radiology 1969;92:709-713.

Early Structured Reporting Systems

  1. Bell D, Greenes R, Doubilet P. Form-based clinical input from a structured vocabulary: Initial application in ultrasound reporting. JAMIA 1992;Symposium Supplement:789-91.
  2. Kahn C, Wang K, Bell D, Structured entry of radiology reports using world-wide web technology. Radiographics 1996;16:683-691.
  3. Bell D, Pattison-Gordon E, Greenes R. Experiments in concept modeling for radiographic image reports. JAMIA 1994;1:249-262.

Evaluation of Structured Reporting Systems

  1. Bell D, Greenes R, Evaluation of UltraSTAR; Performance of a collaborative structured data entry system, JAMIA 1994;Symposium Supplement:216-222.
  2. Moorman P, van Ginneken A, Siersema P, van der Lei J, van Bemmel J. Evaluation of reporting based on descriptional knowledge, JAMIA 1995;2:365-373.
  3. Gouveia-Oliveira A, Raposo V, Salgado N, Almeida I, Nobre-Leitao C, de Melo F. Longitudinal comparative study: The influence of computers on reporting of clinical data. Endoscopy 1991;23:334-7.
  4. Melson D, Brophy R, Blaine J, Jost R, Brink G. Impact of a voice recognition system on report cycle time and radiologist reading time. In Horii S, Blaine J, cds. Proceedings of Medical Imaging 1998: PACS Design and Evaluation, Bellingham, WA: SPIE, 1998:226-236.
Retrieved from "http://reportingwiki.rsna.org/index.php?title=Bibliography&oldid=58"